16 Product-Led Growth Tools for SaaS in 2026

I’ve spent the last few years working with SaaS teams that rely heavily on PLG.

Between launch cycles, onboarding experiments, and activation firefights, I’ve tested a lot of tools.

Instead of listing everything I’ve ever tried, here are the 16 PLG tools for SaaS I actually recommend, grouped by company stage so you don’t end up overbuilding too early:

Early-stage

Growth-stage

Mid-market

Enterprise

Let’s walk through each tool and why it fits the stage it’s recommended for.

Early-stage PLG tools (best for teams focused on activation and onboarding)

Early-stage teams need to focus on onboarding and activation.

They usually need clarity on what new users are doing, where they get stuck, and how to help them complete the first key actions.

1. Userflow: Onboarding and in-app guidance

Stage fit: Early-stage, growth

Team maturity: Beginner

Budget: $$ - Free trial available, paid plans start at $240/month, pPricing scales by MAU

Setup: No engineering needed

Best for: Guided onboarding, checklists, and reducing early drop-off

Limitation: Costs increase quickly as MAUs grow

Userflow works well when you need onboarding in place fast without waiting on engineering. You can build walkthroughs, tooltips, and checklists with a drag-and-drop interface. It’s very customizable and easy to set up.

What I like is how quickly you can A/B test onboarding paths without touching code. The catch is the MAU-based pricing. Early-stage teams love it at first, then feel the lift once usage climbs.

You can also set up an AI Assistant powered by GPT 4, without any coding. I like how it’s so easy to plug into your existing help centre, helping you reduce manual customer support overhead. 

2. Hotjar: User behaviour and heatmaps

Stage fit: Early-stage, growth

Team maturity: Beginner

Budget: $–$$ - Free plan available, paid plans start ~$40/month

Setup: Lightweight script install

Best for: Understanding friction, confusion, and drop-offs across key journeys

Limitation: Not built for deep event or cohort analysis

Hotjar is the tool teams use when numbers stop being enough. Heatmaps show where users actually click, scroll, and spend time. Session replays make it obvious where people hesitate, rage-click, or abandon a flow. 

Funnels help narrow down which step breaks signup or onboarding, and surveys fill in the “why” behind those exits.

Keep in mind, most PLG teams use Hotjar alongside a product analytics tool, not instead of one. It’s the fastest way to sanity-check onboarding changes, catch UX issues early, and understand real user behaviour without setting up complex tracking.

3. Hexus: Demo and product content creation

Stage fit: Early to Mid

Team maturity: Beginner to Advanced

Budget: $ - Free plan available, paid plans start at $40

Setup: Chrome extension or upload-based workflow

Best for: Turning product flows into demos, videos, guides, and onboarding assets

Limitation: Works best when teams already have defined product stories

Hexus helps PMMs, PMs, GTM teams, and founders produce launch-ready product content without designers or video editors. 

You record a flow once and repurpose it into demo videos, interactive walkthroughs, step-by-step guides, and help-centre content. Everything stays synced across templates, so updates don’t pile up when the product changes. 

The biggest advantage is speed. Teams can instantly create demos and onboarding content in minutes instead of weeks.

4. Mixpanel: Product analytics

Stage fit: Early to Enterprise

Team maturity: Intermediate

Budget: $$ - Free tier available, paid plan available at $40/month

Setup: Requires event instrumentation

Best for: Activation, retention, and feature usage analysis

Limitation: Data becomes unreliable without a clean tracking plan

Mixpanel gives you the core product metrics you actually need for PLG: activation, retention curves, and cohort breakdowns. 

Once events are instrumented, it becomes easy to see which actions correlate with long-term usage and which features don’t matter. Most teams use Mixpanel to validate their “aha” moments before iterating on onboarding or messaging. 

The only real friction I found is the setup. If your event naming is inconsistent, every chart becomes questionable.

5. Typeform: Gathering customer feedback and surveys

Stage fit: Early to Mid

Team maturity: Beginner

Budget: $–$$ - No free plan, paid plans start ~$25/month, different pricing tiers available based on general use, HR, or marketing teams

Setup: Simple

Best for: Quick surveys and structured feedback

Limitation: Can get expensive with high response volume

Typeform works well when you need direct input from users without adding extra friction. Most teams place short Typeforms inside empty states, post-onboarding screens, or feature announcements to understand intent or confusion. 

I especially love the different types of form creation that the platform offers, like interactive video forms. Plus, it offers built-in analytics and reporting. 

The UI is clean, response rates are solid, and setup takes minutes. I also like the templates and level of customisation available. Typeform also offers a nice level of integrations, including WordPress, Pipedrive, Mailchimp, Slack, Zendesk, and more. 

6. Mailchimp: Email and lifecycle messaging for activation

Stage fit: Early-stage

Team maturity: Beginner

Budget: $ - Free plan available, paid plans start ~$13/month, pricing scales by audience size

Setup: Fast

Best for: Basic onboarding flows and activation nudges

Limitation: Limited personalisation based on product events

Mailchimp is a straightforward way to send onboarding and activation emails before you invest in a more advanced lifecycle platform.

Most teams use it for simple sequences like post-signup nudges or setup reminders. 

It’s reliable for early workflows, but once you need logic based on product actions, you’ll likely move to something more flexible.

Growth-stage PLG tools

Growth-stage teams usually have a working onboarding flow and a decent understanding of activation patterns.

At this point, the focus shifts to scale, reducing friction at higher user volumes, improving messaging relevance, and running controlled experiments. 

They need PLG software that can help them refine onboarding journeys, run structured tests, understand why users drop off, and validate UX changes before rolling them out.

7. Userlane: Adoption and advanced onboarding

Stage fit: Growth

Team maturity: Intermediate

Budget: $$$ - Enterprise-focused, pricing is custom and scales by MAU + feature set

Setup: Requires implementation + admin training

Best for: Multi-branch onboarding flows and in-app guidance across large user bases

Limitation: Heavy for early-stage teams, overkill if there's littlevolume

Userlane is built for companies that need structured, multi-step onboarding flows at scale.

It supports conditional guidance (if user skips X, show Y), role-based journeys, and detailed tracking for each step. 

It’s typically used in SaaS with complex interfaces or large enterprise customers who expect guided onboarding. Strong platform, but the admin overhead and pricing means ROI takes time.

8. Intercom: In-app messages, chat, and support

Stage fit: Growth to Enterprise

Team maturity: Intermediate to Advanced

Budget: $$$ - Pricing scales by user seats and number of people reached, advanced automation requires higher tiers

Setup: Moderate, requires planning for messaging rules

Best for: Lifecycle messaging, in-app announcements, and support automation

Limitation: Pricing increases sharply with audience growth

Intercom is the default messaging layer for PLG teams that want to reach users at the right moment. It handles onboarding nudges (“you haven’t set up X yet”), in-app announcements, triggered messages, and consolidated chat-based support. 

Their new AI agent, Fin, is really useful if you want a custom GPT for your customer support channel.

All you have to do is train Fin with your procedures, knowledge, and policies, test and deploy the AI agent. The AI-powered insights are also great at analysing and improving Fin’s support. 

Most teams use Intercom to reduce friction during onboarding and to push users toward activation milestones. I find the pricing to be the main barrier. Once your monthly user volume grows, costs ramp up fast.

9. Optimizely: Experimentation and A/B testing

Stage fit: Growth to Enterprise

Team maturity: Advanced

Budget: $$$ - Enterprise-tier pricing, no self-serve plans

Setup: Requires engineering support and experiment setup

Best for: Running controlled experiments across onboarding steps and UX flows

Limitation: Not suitable for teams without experimentation maturity

Optimizely is built for teams that want a formal experimentation program, not just basic A/B tests. You can run tests on onboarding, pricing pages, feature discovery paths, and activation flows. 

It also supports progressive rollouts and multivariate testing. With engineering involvement and the right data volume, it becomes a strong optimisation layer. Without that maturity, the platform is underused and expensive.

10. UserTesting: User research and usability testing

Stage fit: Growth to Enterprise

Team maturity: Intermediate to Advanced

Budget: $$$ - Enterprise pricing based on tiers

Setup: Simple for moderated/unmoderated tests

Best for: Identifying UX friction, validating onboarding changes, and testing prototypes

Limitation: High cost, overkill for teams without a structured research workflow

UserTesting gives fast, reliable qualitative insight from real users. Teams use it to validate onboarding steps, confirm whether new flows make sense, and observe where users hesitate. 

For PLG, it helps teams understand why activation metrics shift before they invest in rewrites.

The challenge is price. It’s positioned for mature teams with dedicated research or design functions, not early scrappy workflows.

Mid-market PLG tools

Mid-market teams usually hit a point where onboarding, activation, and product updates involve product, PMM, CS, sales, and support. 

At this stage, the priority shifts from fixing the funnel to creating repeatable processes. T

hese SaaS growth tools help teams coordinate launches, maintain documentation, manage product work, and keep customer-facing content consistent as the company grows.

11. HubSpot CRM: Best PLG-friendly CRM system

Stage fit: Mid-market to Enterprise

Team maturity: Intermediate

Budget: $$–$$$ - Free CRM available, Sales/Marketing hubs start $50/month and scale by seats + contacts, and hub upgrades

Setup: Moderate, value increases once lifecycle stages and data syncs are configured

Best for: Creating a single source of truth across marketing, sales, CS, and product signals

Limitation: Costs rise quickly once automation, custom reporting, or multiple hubs are added

HubSpot is most useful once multiple teams need the same customer context. Teams typically use it to track contacts, companies, deals, tickets, and activity history in one place.

The free CRM covers pipelines, reporting dashboards, shared inboxes, ticketing, and integrations, which is enough for many mid-market teams to run day-to-day GTM work.

For PLG teams, the real value is lifecycle visibility. Sales and CS can see email engagement, support activity, and account status without switching tools. 

I found the AI features like record summaries and activity insights to help at scale, but HubSpot works best as a coordination layer — not a product analytics system. Once automation and advanced reporting become critical, pricing ramps fast.

12. ClickUp: Product management and roadmapping

Stage fit: Mid-market to Enterprise

Team maturity: Intermediate

Budget: $–$$ - Free plan available with paid plans starting from $7/month

Setup: Moderate, flexible but requires workspace structure

Best for: Cross-team project tracking and centralisation, roadmaps, and release planning 

Limitation: Overwhelming without governance, interface complexity slows adoption

ClickUp is widely adopted because it consolidates product planning, documentation, and task tracking in one place. 

PMs use it for roadmaps, GTM teams use it for launch coordination, and CS uses it for internal processes.

It’s more customizable than tools like Trello or Asana, which is helpful for multi-team workflows, but the downside is inconsistency. If teams don’t agree on naming and structure, ClickUp gets messy fast.

ClickUp’s AI layer (Brain AI) is built into tasks, docs, comments, and chat. It helps generate task descriptions, summarise long threads, break large items into subtasks, draft project plans, auto-prioritise work, and surface context-aware answers without leaving the workspace. 

But I found the UI a bit clunky and quite in-depth for someone looking for a more straightforward documentation and task tracking tool. 

13. Zendesk: Knowledge base and central documentation system

Stage fit: Mid-market

Team maturity: Intermediate

Budget: $$ - Paid plans start at $19/month, pricing scales by seats

Setup: Straightforward

Best for: Structured documentation and help centre content

Limitation: Customisation is limited without developer support

Zendesk is a reliable product-led growth software to maintain an organised help centre when your product and documentation footprint grow. CS teams use it to manage structured articles, update content after releases, and track which guides users' access before submitting tickets. 

It’s simple enough for support teams to manage, but deeper customisation (layouts, dynamic blocks, branded elements) often requires development work.

Enterprise PLG tools

Enterprise PLG motions require structure in terms of ownership across teams, data pipelines, feature rollouts, and predictable customer success workflows.

At this stage, tools need to support scale, integrations, permissions, and auditability. 

14. Catalyst: Best customer success platform

Stage fit: Enterprise

Team maturity: Advanced

Budget: $$$ - Custom quotes based on seats and account volume

Setup: Requires integration with CRM + product data sources

Best for: Account health tracking, renewals, expansion workflows

Limitation: Needs clean product and CRM data to be effective

Catalyst centralises customer health, usage insights, and playbooks for CS teams. It helps identify accounts at risk and accounts ready for expansion by combining product signals with CRM activity. 

Strong fit for companies with structured CS motions and dedicated CSMs. The platform is powerful once data is clean and connected, but without reliable product usage data, most dashboards lose value quickly.

15. Segment by Twilio: Best customer data platform (CDP)

Stage fit: Enterprise

Team maturity: Advanced

Budget: $$–$$$ - Free tier available, team plans start ~$120/month, business plans are contract-only, pricing scales by MTUs + event volume

Setup: Requires engineering setup and source/destination mapping

Best for: Routing product events to analytics, CRM, and messaging tools

Limitation: Can become expensive with high MTU and event volume

Segment serves as the data foundation for PLG teams that want consistent tracking across tools. You define events once and route them to Mixpanel, HubSpot, Intercom, or your warehouse. 

This prevents each team from creating conflicting definitions and keeps analytics consistent.

Pricing is tied to monthly tracked users and event volume, so costs escalate as usage increases, which is usually the tipping point for evaluating warehouse-native alternatives.

16. Flagsmith: Feature flagging and rollout management

Stage fit: Enterprise

Team maturity: Intermediate to Advanced

Budget: $$ - Free plan available with paid plans starting from $45/month, eEnterprise plans available based on different tiers

Setup: Requires engineering implementation

Best for: Controlled rollouts, staged experiments, and gating features by audience

Limitation: Requires workflow discipline across product and engineering

Flagsmith gives engineering teams control over feature rollouts without requiring full deployments.

You can ship features to specific cohorts, test onboarding flows with subsets of users, and gate functionality for certain plans or geographies. 

It’s helpful when your PLG motion relies on testing new UX or activation changes safely. I also find the open-source option appealing, but teams still need engineering discipline to manage flag sprawl and naming consistency.

Final thoughts

Choosing the right product-led growth tools is easier when your PLG stack reflects your actual company stage. A simple way to think about it:

  • Early-stage teams: Need PLG onboarding tools that help users reach activation.
  • Growth-stage teams: Need PLG analytics tools and messaging systems to refine journeys.
  • Mid-market teams: Need alignment tools, documentation systems, and repeatable workflows.
  • Enterprise teams: Need structured product-led growth software that supports scale, controlled rollouts, and clean data flows.

Use this guide as a starting point for selecting the best PLG tools for your current maturity.

If you match tools to your real bottlenecks (not the ones you expect to have later), you’ll end up with PLG tools for SaaS that actually move users toward value and support long-term growth. 

‍

How Hexus helps with Personalization

More Articles

The Only Product Launch Checklist You Need
12 Successful Product Marketing Content Examples That Hold Up
12 SaaS Product Tour Examples to Get Inspired By